1 Week 05 : 23 and 25 September 2008

ثبت نشده
چکیده

We now begin the discussion of software issues such as step size control (Sects. continuous output ([HNW93] Sect. II.5) and automatic stiffness detection ([HW96] Sect. IV.2) schemes for embedded Runge–Kutta methods. 2 Stepsize control Suppose we take a code such as rksuite and try to reverse engineer it to extract the RAS of the methods it implements. Consider running it on the equation y ′ = λy and seeing when u n →0; the code requires an error tolerance ǫ, not too large, and varies h to provide a solution with local error ǫ in each step. When hλ is outside the RAS, the solution will be inaccurate and the code will reduce h to maintain accuracy. Thus the numerical solution will always →0 for ℜλ < 0, and the determination of the RAS is a little more subtle. The RAS could be determined by finding the cost of the method for each λ: in the RAS, the step size is O(ǫ −1/p) as the error ǫ→0, while outside the RAS the step size is determined by stiffness to be O(1/|λ|). This is tricky to decide, so we need to know a little more about how such codes choose the step size to control the error. The goal of step size selection strategies is to produce a solution which is very likely to be within a user–specified tolerance ǫ of the exact solution, at minimal cost (necessarily depending on ǫ like O(ǫ −1/p) for an order–p method). The classical step–doubling approach based on Richardson extrap-olation is instructive and will be useful, but modern codes use an alternate approach called " embedded " Runge–Kutta methods. It is important to control the error because engineering computations are worth a lot more when they include error estimates or bounds. The overall approach to controlling the error of a one–step method of order p is straightforward. Suppose we just took a step of size H from u n−1 to u n and computed an error estimate E n , and now we want to determine the largest step size h that will give us u n+1 with error estimate E n+1 ≤ ǫ. The step h may also be required to satisfy other constraints such as: a singularity occurs at internal time t * , where we would like to stop and restart, or the user has requested output at certain times T j. …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Past IJCAI Conferences

23 IJCAI-13: Beijing, China (August 3–9) 22 IJCAI-11: Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain (July 16–22) 21 IJCAI-09: Pasadena, California, USA (July 11–17) 20 IJCAI-07: Hyderabad, India (January 6–12) 19 IJCAI-05: Edinburgh, Scotland (July 30–August 5) 18 IJCAI-03: Acapulco, Mexico (August 9–15) 17 IJCAI-01: Seattle, Washington, USA (August 4–10) 16 IJCAI-99: Stockholm, Sweden (July 31–August 6) 15 IJCA...

متن کامل

Artificial Intervertebral Disc: Cervical Spine

Professional Institutional Original Effective Date: September 25, 2007 Original Effective Date: October 23, 2008 Revision Date(s): September 23, 2008 May 18, 2010; March 8, 2013; January 1, 2015; August 5, 2015; October 12, 2016 Revision Date(s): December 15, 2009; May 18, 2010; March 8, 2013; January 1, 2015; August 5, 2015; October 12, 2016 Current Effective Date: October 12, 2016 Current Eff...

متن کامل

Past IJCAI Conferences

This volume constitutes the twenty-first IJCAI conference. The locations and times of all twenty-one IJCAI conferences are as follows: 21 IJCAI-09: Pasadena, California, USA (July 11–17) 20 IJCAI-07: Hyderabad, India (January 6–12) 19 IJCAI-05: Edinburgh, Scotland (July 30–August 5) 18 IJCAI-03: Acapulco, Mexico (August 9–15) 17 IJCAI-01: Seattle, Washington, USA (August 4–10) 16 IJCAI-99: Stoc...

متن کامل

Past IJCAI Conferences

xvii This volume constitutes the twentieth IJCAI conference. The locations and times of all twenty IJCAI conferences are as follows: 20 IJCAI-07: Hyderabad, India (January 6–12) 19 IJCAI-05: Edinburgh, Scotland (July 30–August 5) 18 IJCAI-03: Acapulco, Mexico (August 9–15) 17 IJCAI-01: Seattle, Washington, USA (August 4–10) 16 IJCAI-99: Stockholm, Sweden (July 31–August 6) 15 IJCAI-97: Nagoya, ...

متن کامل

Past IJCAI Conferences

22 IJCAI-11: Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain (July 16–22) 21 IJCAI-09: Pasadena, California, USA (July 11–17) 20 IJCAI-07: Hyderabad, India (January 6–12) 19 IJCAI-05: Edinburgh, Scotland (July 30–August 5) 18 IJCAI-03: Acapulco, Mexico (August 9–15) 17 IJCAI-01: Seattle, Washington, USA (August 4–10) 16 IJCAI-99: Stockholm, Sweden (July 31–August 6) 15 IJCAI-97: Nagoya, Japan (August 23–29) 14 IJC...

متن کامل

Continuum removal versus PLSR method for clay and calcium carbonate content estimation from laboratory and airborne hyperspectral measurements

Article history: Reflectance spectroscopy p Received 4 July 2008 Received in revised form 18 September 2008 Accepted 23 September 2008 Available online 25 October 2008

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008